TRENDS IN FINANCIAL SERVICES SUPERVISION
* Other responses: “Geopolitical change”, “Asset bubbles/indebtness”, “Fragmentation”, “Banks competing with non-banks driving up risk profiles”
Source: Oliver Wyman “Future of Supervision” Survey, 2018
These trends bring in new risks and additional challenges for supervisors. But they also represent opportunities to rethink the current supervisory model, remove inefficiencies and create a nimble, intelligence-led approach to supervision.
Many have started moving in this direction already, but they still have a long way to go. We expect the remit and practices of supervisors to change significantly over the next decade. While implementing change is always challenging, starting this journey now will allow the supervisor of 2025 to keep pace with a rapidly evolving industry.
SUPERVISORS FACE A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT
We surveyed about 60 financial authorities around the world about new industry trends and their likely impact on supervisory and regulatory processes. More than 60 percent of respondents indicated that they expect industry trends to change the traditional risk based approach to supervision. Though varied, their responses clearly point in one direction: Financial supervisors oversee an industry that is transforming rapidly, and they anticipate this will have a profound effect on the way they operate.
SURVEY RESPONDENTS EXPECT MEANINGFUL CHANGES TO SUPERVISORY MODELS
Source: Oliver Wyman Future of Supervision Survey, 2018
The overall finding of our survey is clear: the need to change (driven by the industry) combined with the ability to change (enabled by advances in technology and analytics) will result in transformed supervisory models by 2025. We identify five broad areas of likely change.
As always, transformation will be challenging. Regulatory frameworks will need to be revised. And authorities will face a range of pressures, differing by jurisdiction, arising from their changing mandates, institutional fragmentation, and regulatory “Balkanization” aimed at protecting national interests. The difficulty authorities face is not primarily in the development of new supervisory techniques but the ability to push these from the innovation teams to business-as-usual supervision. Nevertheless, many supervisors are starting to move in this direction, and we expect all major markets to undergo significant change in the supervisory model over the next decade.